During the session, Mutamba abruptly interrupted the proceedings, accusing the panel of judges of acting under political pressure. “Is this intimidation or a threat?” he asked in a raised voice, visibly agitated by the tone and direction of the questioning. “Stop what you are doing right now. Mr. Judges, I am not here to receive threats.”
Mutamba’s speech took a dramatic turn when he suggested that a larger political conspiracy may be in motion. “If you already have a plan, a conspiracy prepared, go ahead. I will take full responsibility,” he declared, facing the judges directly.
While the specific legal charges have not been publicly detailed, sources close to the case suggest that Mutamba is being investigated for “undermining state institutions” and alleged incitement through his recent political speeches and media appearances. Supporters of Mutamba, however, insist that the accusations are fabricated and part of a broader strategy to silence dissent ahead of potential electoral shifts.
Over the past months, Mutamba has emerged as one of the most vocal critics of the government, often calling out corruption, human rights violations, and what he describes as the “instrumentalization of justice” to target opposition leaders.
The incident has already triggered strong reactions from civil society organizations, lawyers, and human rights defenders. Me Jean-Claude Katende, president of ASADHO (African Association for the Defense of Human Rights), stated: “The behavior of the judges, if proven to be politically motivated, would be a violation of the Constitution and the principle of separation of powers. Justice must remain neutral, especially in politically sensitive cases.”
Meanwhile, pro-government voices argue that no one is above the law, and Mutamba must respond to the accusations with respect and decorum. “The courtroom is not a political stage,” said a ruling party MP who requested anonymity. “Mr. Mutamba is trying to turn his trial into a political spectacle.”
This event comes amid growing concerns over shrinking political space in the DRC. Several opposition leaders have recently reported surveillance, arbitrary arrests, and the blocking of political rallies. International observers, including the United Nations Joint Human Rights Office (UNJHRO), have urged Congolese authorities to uphold fundamental freedoms and ensure due process for all citizens, regardless of political affiliation.
Constant Mutamba has vowed to continue his political engagement “with courage and without fear.” He reiterated outside the courtroom: “They can jail me, they can silence me, but they will not stop the truth.”
The case is scheduled to resume next week, and all eyes will be on the judiciary to determine whether it can navigate this case with transparency and independence or whether, as critics warn, it will deepen public mistrust in Congo’s justice system.
